Over 50 Years of Experience

Nationwide Maritime Lawyers Assisting Residents of Mobile, AL Injured Anywhere in the Country

  • Over $1 Billion Recovered for Maritime Accident Victims
  • Free Confidential Case Review
  • Over 1,900 5-Star Reviews

companies we’ve taken on and won:

Mobile Maritime Lawyers

Mobile, AL is a major port city of the South—it is in fact the only saltwater port in the entire state of Alabama. The Port of Mobile, the 9th largest in the U.S., is connected to 1,500 miles of waterways, including the Ohio and Tennessee river valleys. That’s why the city of Mobile, AL is home to many maritime employees. They work in often perilous conditions, due to extreme weather conditions, heavy cargo, unsafe elevated platforms, and other threats to their safety. As a result, offshore accidents are fairly common—and they can result in severe injuries.

Are injured seamen eligible for financial compensation? Yes—but how much money they can get depends on a variety of factors. An experienced maritime lawyer can help you sort through your options and determine the right way to proceed with your claim. Our nationally based maritime injury lawyers have a presence in Mobile, AL as well as other major ports around the country.

Workplace Injuries in the Maritime Sector

For modern-day seamen, there are quite a few ways to get seriously hurt while on the job. It’s no surprise, then, that maritime injuries are so varied. Our maritime personal injury lawyers have represented clients with a wide range of work-related injuries and ailments, including:

  • Back/Spinal cord injuries
  • Pleural disorders
  • Amputation
  • Compartment Syndrome
  • Third-degree skin burns
  • Brain damage
  • Hypothermia
  • Frostbite

These are just some of the more common types of maritime injuries we’ve encountered. If you’re been seriously hurt while performing your job duties, please contact our longshoremen attorneys as soon as possible.

Maintenance and Cure: The Basic Form of Compensation

Under traditional maritime law, workers who become injured in connection with their duties are entitled to a type of financial compensation called maintenance and cure, which is paid out either weekly or biweekly. It actually consists of two types of compensation: maintenance is recompense for living expenses, while cure is intended to cover medical expenses relating to the injury or ailment.

This type of compensation is the easiest to get, as it is paid out on a “no-fault” basis. Sometimes, though, seamen have difficulty obtaining the full amount of money they are entitled to receive. In those cases, they should contact a maritime lawyer who can help. Our nationwide Jones Act lawyers, who serve residents of Mobile, AL, have years of experience with these claims.

Other Features of Maritime Law

You have additional options if it can be shown that your injury was caused by an employer or co-worker’s negligence. The team of admiralty lawyers at Schechter, Shaffer & Harris, L.L.P., are well versed in all aspects of maritime law.

Our Areas of Specialty

Maritime personal injury law consists of various facets that tend to prove confusing to those who are not experienced admiralty lawyers. Our team handles a wide variety of maritime issues, including these:

Case Results

$17.5 Million

head injury

$4.5 Million

offshore explosion

$3 Million

back injury

$2.5 Million

tug injury

Contact a Jones Act Attorney Serving Mobile, AL

An experienced maritime accident lawyer can identify which laws and regulations apply to your case and help you obtain the compensation you deserve. Our nationally based Jones Act lawyers represent clients in Mobile, AL and neighboring areas.

As one of the leading nationwide maritime law firms in the U.S., Schechter, Shaffer & Harris, L.L.P., represents clients from all over the country. A free, no-risk case consultation with a maritime accident lawyer is available. We can be reached any time of the day or night at 1-800-836-5830.

Featured In:

News Outlets and Professional Awards

Free Case Evaluation

No Obligation, In-Depth Case Review